Johnson wrote (Heyer, 1966):
The painters have every advantage over us today...Besides being able to tear up their failures—we never can seem to grow ivy fast enough—their materials cost them nothing. They have no committees of laymen telling them what to do. They have no deadlines, no budgets. We are all sickeningly familiar with the final cuts to our plans at the last moment. Why not take out the landscaping, the retaining walls, the colonnades? The building would be just as useful and much cheaper. True, an architect leads a hard life—for an artist.
...Comfort is not a function of beauty... purpose is not necessary to make a building beautiful...sooner or later we will fit our buildings so that they can be used...where form comes from I don't know, but it has nothing at all to do with the functional or sociological aspects of our architecture.
Thursday, June 01, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
So you architects must make it your mission to educate the laymen (who have the means and power) on the importance of having beautiful, iconic buildings. Otherwise we may in future looking at boxes and boxes - functional boxes...(shudder)
Post a Comment